<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1116 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393972</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the petitioner to file fresh objections within two weeks challenging the notice of unexplained cash purchase determination. The Assessing Officer was directed to review the objections independently, provide a personal hearing to the petitioner within four weeks, and make orders accordingly. The Court disposed of the writ petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:40:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1116 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393972</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the petitioner to file fresh objections within two weeks challenging the notice of unexplained cash purchase determination. The Assessing Officer was directed to review the objections independently, provide a personal hearing to the petitioner within four weeks, and make orders accordingly. The Court disposed of the writ petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>