<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1106 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393962</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the judgments and decrees of the lower courts. The plaintiff&#039;s title over the suit property was upheld based on the registered deed of settlement executed by defendant No.1. The court found no substantial question of law involved in the appeal and emphasized the civil court&#039;s jurisdiction to decide on the title despite the entries in the Record of Rights. The appeal was dismissed on contest, without cost.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:21:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1106 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393962</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the judgments and decrees of the lower courts. The plaintiff&#039;s title over the suit property was upheld based on the registered deed of settlement executed by defendant No.1. The court found no substantial question of law involved in the appeal and emphasized the civil court&#039;s jurisdiction to decide on the title despite the entries in the Record of Rights. The appeal was dismissed on contest, without cost.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>