<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1107 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393963</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the civil revision challenging the trial court&#039;s decision to deny the dismissal of the counter claim under Order 7 Rule 11(d) of the Civil Procedure Code. The case involved a dispute over a property purchase claimed to be a benami transaction. The court emphasized the requirement for evidence in determining benami transactions, citing relevant case law and upholding the trial court&#039;s decision as legally sound.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2020 17:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1107 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393963</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the civil revision challenging the trial court&#039;s decision to deny the dismissal of the counter claim under Order 7 Rule 11(d) of the Civil Procedure Code. The case involved a dispute over a property purchase claimed to be a benami transaction. The court emphasized the requirement for evidence in determining benami transactions, citing relevant case law and upholding the trial court&#039;s decision as legally sound.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>