https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393964 Financial assistance by a father towards sale consideration, without a pleading that he agreed to purchase property in the name of the beneficiary, does not by itself attract the definition of a benami transaction under Section 2(a) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988. On the pleaded facts, the statutory bar under Sections 3 and 4 was not disclosed, so rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure was not justified. The suit was therefore not barred by benami law, and the application for rejection of plaint failed. en-us Mon, 02 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:22:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393964 Financial assistance by a father towards sale consideration, without a pleading that he agreed to purchase property in the name of the beneficiary, does not by itself attract the definition of a benami transaction under Section 2(a) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988. On the pleaded facts, the statutory bar under Sections 3 and 4 was not disclosed, so rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure was not justified. The suit was therefore not barred by benami law, and the application for rejection of plaint failed. Case-Laws Benami Property Mon, 02 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393964