https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393964 The court affirmed the trial court's decision to dismiss the petitioner's application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in a suit for refund of advance amount paid, claiming it was not barred under the Prohibition of Benami Transactions Act. The court held that receiving financial help from the respondent's deceased father for the sale consideration did not constitute a Benami transaction under the Act, emphasizing that the Act's definition should not be narrowly construed based on the source of funds. The petitioner's revision under Section 115 of CPC was dismissed by the court. en-us Mon, 02 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:22:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393964 The court affirmed the trial court's decision to dismiss the petitioner's application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in a suit for refund of advance amount paid, claiming it was not barred under the Prohibition of Benami Transactions Act. The court held that receiving financial help from the respondent's deceased father for the sale consideration did not constitute a Benami transaction under the Act, emphasizing that the Act's definition should not be narrowly construed based on the source of funds. The petitioner's revision under Section 115 of CPC was dismissed by the court. Case-Laws Benami Property Mon, 02 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393964