<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>PROFITEERING ON SUPPLY OF FMCG GOODS UPHELD AND STAYED</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9014</link>
    <description>The NAA, relying on DGAP investigation reports, found the supplier denied GST rate reduction benefits, quantified profiteering, ordered commensurate price reduction, directed deposit of the net profiteered amount into Consumer Welfare Funds after crediting amounts already set aside, imposed interest from dates realised, and noted potential penalty liability; Commissioners were directed to monitor compliance under DGAP supervision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2020 09:51:18 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2020 09:51:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>PROFITEERING ON SUPPLY OF FMCG GOODS UPHELD AND STAYED</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9014</link>
      <description>The NAA, relying on DGAP investigation reports, found the supplier denied GST rate reduction benefits, quantified profiteering, ordered commensurate price reduction, directed deposit of the net profiteered amount into Consumer Welfare Funds after crediting amounts already set aside, imposed interest from dates realised, and noted potential penalty liability; Commissioners were directed to monitor compliance under DGAP supervision.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2020 09:51:18 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>