https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287029 The court concluded that the partition suit could not be dismissed at the preliminary stage based on the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988. It emphasized that the determination of whether the property constituted a benami transaction and the intention behind the property purchase in 1956 and 1965 could only be made after evidence is presented at the final hearing. The court found no jurisdictional error in the lower court's order rejecting the defendants' petition and dismissed the civil revision. en-us Thu, 15 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Mar 2020 14:38:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287029 The court concluded that the partition suit could not be dismissed at the preliminary stage based on the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988. It emphasized that the determination of whether the property constituted a benami transaction and the intention behind the property purchase in 1956 and 1965 could only be made after evidence is presented at the final hearing. The court found no jurisdictional error in the lower court's order rejecting the defendants' petition and dismissed the civil revision. Case-Laws Benami Property Thu, 15 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287029