<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1081 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393937</link>
    <description>The court quashed the order rejecting the petitioner&#039;s application for condonation of delay in filing income tax returns and remitted the matter for fresh consideration. The petitioner was directed to provide additional medical evidence and an affidavit within one month. The 1st respondent was instructed to reconsider the application within 2-3 months, considering the petitioner&#039;s genuine hardship and relevant judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2020 14:34:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1081 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393937</link>
      <description>The court quashed the order rejecting the petitioner&#039;s application for condonation of delay in filing income tax returns and remitted the matter for fresh consideration. The petitioner was directed to provide additional medical evidence and an affidavit within one month. The 1st respondent was instructed to reconsider the application within 2-3 months, considering the petitioner&#039;s genuine hardship and relevant judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>