<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1078 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393934</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) set aside the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039; decision and directed the Assessing Officer to verify the claim of the assessee regarding the stock difference already being taxed in the previous assessment year. If verified, the addition made for the year in question would lead to double taxation and should be removed. The ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, ordering a reevaluation by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2020 14:31:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1078 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393934</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) set aside the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039; decision and directed the Assessing Officer to verify the claim of the assessee regarding the stock difference already being taxed in the previous assessment year. If verified, the addition made for the year in question would lead to double taxation and should be removed. The ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, ordering a reevaluation by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>