<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (10) TMI 32 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21808</link>
    <description>A partnership firm is a &quot;person&quot; under section 2(31) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and can be prosecuted for contravention of section 276B for failure to deduct and deposit tax on interest payments. The fact that the statutory punishment includes imprisonment does not bar criminal liability or conviction of the firm for the tax default. The firm&#039;s conviction was therefore sustained, along with the fine imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:04:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (10) TMI 32 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21808</link>
      <description>A partnership firm is a &quot;person&quot; under section 2(31) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and can be prosecuted for contravention of section 276B for failure to deduct and deposit tax on interest payments. The fact that the statutory punishment includes imprisonment does not bar criminal liability or conviction of the firm for the tax default. The firm&#039;s conviction was therefore sustained, along with the fine imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>