<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1069 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393925</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to disallow club membership and subscription fees as business expenditure for an assessee partner in a partnership firm. The Tribunal ruled that the expenses were not wholly and exclusively for business purposes, as they were not incurred in the name of the firm and not paid from the firm account. Consequently, the expenses were deemed personal or capital in nature, leading to the dismissal of the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2020 14:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1069 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393925</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to disallow club membership and subscription fees as business expenditure for an assessee partner in a partnership firm. The Tribunal ruled that the expenses were not wholly and exclusively for business purposes, as they were not incurred in the name of the firm and not paid from the firm account. Consequently, the expenses were deemed personal or capital in nature, leading to the dismissal of the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>