https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393923 The court dismissed the writ petition filed by Container Shipping Lines Association and others challenging a notice allowing importers with AEO status or DPD facility to pay terminal handling charges directly to terminal operators. The court found that the petitioners lacked cause of action as there was an existing contract between them and the clients. It cited a Bombay High Court judgment supporting similar facility notices to enhance container movement efficiency. The court concluded that disputes between shipping lines and importers should be resolved under contract law, without judicial interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. en-us Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Mar 2020 13:20:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393923 The court dismissed the writ petition filed by Container Shipping Lines Association and others challenging a notice allowing importers with AEO status or DPD facility to pay terminal handling charges directly to terminal operators. The court found that the petitioners lacked cause of action as there was an existing contract between them and the clients. It cited a Bombay High Court judgment supporting similar facility notices to enhance container movement efficiency. The court concluded that disputes between shipping lines and importers should be resolved under contract law, without judicial interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393923