<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1064 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393920</link>
    <description>The court declined to transfer the appeal from the South Zonal Bench to the West Zonal Bench but allowed the petitioner to apply to the Appellate Tribunal. The Supreme Court upheld the technical member&#039;s appointment and directed the appeal to be heard by different members to avoid prejudice. The court emphasized the need for an impartial hearing and ensured fairness by assigning a different touring member for the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1064 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393920</link>
      <description>The court declined to transfer the appeal from the South Zonal Bench to the West Zonal Bench but allowed the petitioner to apply to the Appellate Tribunal. The Supreme Court upheld the technical member&#039;s appointment and directed the appeal to be heard by different members to avoid prejudice. The court emphasized the need for an impartial hearing and ensured fairness by assigning a different touring member for the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>