https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393916 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, holding that the deactivation of Directors Identification Numbers (DINs) should be limited to the defaulting company and not extended to other companies where the directors were involved. The court emphasized that the Registrar of Companies cannot deactivate DINs solely based on disqualification under Section 164(2)(a) without a specific provision in the Companies Act, 2013. The court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the orders deactivating the petitioners' DINs and directing the reactivation or allocation of new DIN numbers within a specified timeframe. en-us Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Jan 2021 18:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393916 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, holding that the deactivation of Directors Identification Numbers (DINs) should be limited to the defaulting company and not extended to other companies where the directors were involved. The court emphasized that the Registrar of Companies cannot deactivate DINs solely based on disqualification under Section 164(2)(a) without a specific provision in the Companies Act, 2013. The court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the orders deactivating the petitioners' DINs and directing the reactivation or allocation of new DIN numbers within a specified timeframe. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393916