<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1058 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL — HYDERABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393914</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application seeking to restrain the liquidator from invoking the bank guarantee, as no evidence of fraud or irreparable harm was presented. The Tribunal emphasized that disputes over contract performance require detailed consideration and cannot justify blocking an unconditional bank guarantee. Therefore, the application was dismissed, and any interim orders were vacated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2020 11:47:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1058 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL — HYDERABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393914</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application seeking to restrain the liquidator from invoking the bank guarantee, as no evidence of fraud or irreparable harm was presented. The Tribunal emphasized that disputes over contract performance require detailed consideration and cannot justify blocking an unconditional bank guarantee. Therefore, the application was dismissed, and any interim orders were vacated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>