<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1577 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287020</link>
    <description>A document styled as a partition deed, executed by an absolute owner in favour of his sons, was ineffective as a partition because the sons had no pre-existing right to demand partition during the father&#039;s lifetime. If the transfer was intended to benefit them, it had to satisfy the legal requirements of a gift, donation inter vivos, or family arrangement. Reliance on the Hindu Succession Act did not validate this inter vivos transaction, and a procedural challenge under Order XXXII Rule 7 CPC could not overcome the absence of substantive rights in the minors. The challenged decree was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2020 10:28:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=608017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1577 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287020</link>
      <description>A document styled as a partition deed, executed by an absolute owner in favour of his sons, was ineffective as a partition because the sons had no pre-existing right to demand partition during the father&#039;s lifetime. If the transfer was intended to benefit them, it had to satisfy the legal requirements of a gift, donation inter vivos, or family arrangement. Reliance on the Hindu Succession Act did not validate this inter vivos transaction, and a procedural challenge under Order XXXII Rule 7 CPC could not overcome the absence of substantive rights in the minors. The challenged decree was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>