<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (6) TMI 366 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287004</link>
    <description>Eviction could not be sustained on an abandoned ground of damage, addition or alteration under the Transfer of Property Act, because a party cannot be allowed to revive an not pressed at trial. Subletting was upheld on concurrent findings of exclusive possession by a third party: written landlord consent is required, and mere knowledge, acquiescence, rent acceptance, or long occupation does not amount to waiver or create a lawful subtenancy. The substitution order also stood, as the later supply of the death date and the accepted explanation supported bringing the legal representatives on record and curing any abatement objection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:39:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (6) TMI 366 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287004</link>
      <description>Eviction could not be sustained on an abandoned ground of damage, addition or alteration under the Transfer of Property Act, because a party cannot be allowed to revive an not pressed at trial. Subletting was upheld on concurrent findings of exclusive possession by a third party: written landlord consent is required, and mere knowledge, acquiescence, rent acceptance, or long occupation does not amount to waiver or create a lawful subtenancy. The substitution order also stood, as the later supply of the death date and the accepted explanation supported bringing the legal representatives on record and curing any abatement objection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>