<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (9) TMI 106 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287003</link>
    <description>The Calcutta High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the validity of an arbitration award made by the Bengal Chamber of Commerce. The appellant&#039;s claim of arbitrators&#039; misconduct for proceeding ex parte without proper notice was rejected. The court found the appellant&#039;s absence deliberate and unsupported by evidence, affirming the award&#039;s validity. Emphasizing adherence to arbitration rules, the court upheld the award and highlighted the consequences of non-appearance during proceedings. The appeal was dismissed with costs, underscoring the importance of parties&#039; compliance with arbitration procedures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:20:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (9) TMI 106 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287003</link>
      <description>The Calcutta High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the validity of an arbitration award made by the Bengal Chamber of Commerce. The appellant&#039;s claim of arbitrators&#039; misconduct for proceeding ex parte without proper notice was rejected. The court found the appellant&#039;s absence deliberate and unsupported by evidence, affirming the award&#039;s validity. Emphasizing adherence to arbitration rules, the court upheld the award and highlighted the consequences of non-appearance during proceedings. The appeal was dismissed with costs, underscoring the importance of parties&#039; compliance with arbitration procedures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>