<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (10) TMI 31 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21799</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the ITAT to consider whether the assessing authority was justified in imposing a penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act on the assessee and if the Tribunal was correct in upholding the order with modifications. The Court highlighted the need to assess if there was deliberate concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars by the assessee, emphasizing the importance of legal provisions and judicial decisions in penalty proceedings. The case centered on commission payments involving a benami transaction, prompting a reevaluation of the penalty imposition and the ITAT&#039;s decision in light of the legal standards outlined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 13:31:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (10) TMI 31 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21799</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the ITAT to consider whether the assessing authority was justified in imposing a penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act on the assessee and if the Tribunal was correct in upholding the order with modifications. The Court highlighted the need to assess if there was deliberate concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars by the assessee, emphasizing the importance of legal provisions and judicial decisions in penalty proceedings. The case centered on commission payments involving a benami transaction, prompting a reevaluation of the penalty imposition and the ITAT&#039;s decision in light of the legal standards outlined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>