<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1018 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393874</link>
    <description>Registration under section 12AA(3) may be cancelled only where the objects are not genuine or the activities are not carried out in accordance with those objects; a mere allegation of commercial activity is insufficient. The assessee&#039;s developmental and public utility functions, including housing, roads, civic amenities, parks and other area-development works, were treated as consistent with its statutory objects. Sale of land by auction and development agreements were also viewed as compatible with the governing urban development framework. The proviso to section 2(15) did not, by itself, justify cancellation of registration at that stage, and the cancellation order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 12:20:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1018 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393874</link>
      <description>Registration under section 12AA(3) may be cancelled only where the objects are not genuine or the activities are not carried out in accordance with those objects; a mere allegation of commercial activity is insufficient. The assessee&#039;s developmental and public utility functions, including housing, roads, civic amenities, parks and other area-development works, were treated as consistent with its statutory objects. Sale of land by auction and development agreements were also viewed as compatible with the governing urban development framework. The proviso to section 2(15) did not, by itself, justify cancellation of registration at that stage, and the cancellation order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>