<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1017 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393873</link>
    <description>An addition under section 68 was treated as unsustainable where the assessee supported a joint venture receipt with contemporaneous documents, including the agreement, correspondence, board resolutions, project records, land conversion papers, bank entries and repayment evidence on cancellation. The adverse third-party statements relied on were found unreliable because one was recorded without furnishing the full material or allowing cross-examination, and the other was retracted by affidavit and complaint. As the revenue did not carry out independent inquiry to discredit the documents or establish that the transaction was a sham, the addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1017 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393873</link>
      <description>An addition under section 68 was treated as unsustainable where the assessee supported a joint venture receipt with contemporaneous documents, including the agreement, correspondence, board resolutions, project records, land conversion papers, bank entries and repayment evidence on cancellation. The adverse third-party statements relied on were found unreliable because one was recorded without furnishing the full material or allowing cross-examination, and the other was retracted by affidavit and complaint. As the revenue did not carry out independent inquiry to discredit the documents or establish that the transaction was a sham, the addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>