<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appeal&#039;s Validity Challenged Due to Non-Compliance with Pre-Deposit Rule u/s 129E of Customs Act, 1962.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=52528</link>
    <description>Maintainability of appeal - compliance of pre-deposit - The first appellate authority erred in taking up the appeal preferred before it despite non-compliance of Section 129E of Customs Act, 1962 - To hear the appeal arising from an order issued without jurisdiction would be to compound the illegality of the proceedings. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:53:40 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:53:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appeal&#039;s Validity Challenged Due to Non-Compliance with Pre-Deposit Rule u/s 129E of Customs Act, 1962.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=52528</link>
      <description>Maintainability of appeal - compliance of pre-deposit - The first appellate authority erred in taking up the appeal preferred before it despite non-compliance of Section 129E of Customs Act, 1962 - To hear the appeal arising from an order issued without jurisdiction would be to compound the illegality of the proceedings. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:53:40 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=52528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>