<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1009 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393865</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the first appellate authority to consider the appeal within the statutory jurisdiction. It emphasized the necessity of compliance with Section 129E for entertaining appeals and the proper procedural conduct for recovery of duties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:53:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1009 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393865</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the first appellate authority to consider the appeal within the statutory jurisdiction. It emphasized the necessity of compliance with Section 129E for entertaining appeals and the proper procedural conduct for recovery of duties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>