<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1002 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393858</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, remanding the case for consideration on merits. The appellant&#039;s appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was rejected as time-barred due to lack of proof of service of the Order-in-Original. Despite the department&#039;s inability to provide evidence of service, the Tribunal granted the appellant the opportunity to contest the case on merits, emphasizing the significance of proper service and concrete evidence in legal proceedings for fair treatment of parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:12:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1002 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393858</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, remanding the case for consideration on merits. The appellant&#039;s appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was rejected as time-barred due to lack of proof of service of the Order-in-Original. Despite the department&#039;s inability to provide evidence of service, the Tribunal granted the appellant the opportunity to contest the case on merits, emphasizing the significance of proper service and concrete evidence in legal proceedings for fair treatment of parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>