<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1001 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393857</link>
    <description>Time for completion of arbitral proceedings and making the award was extended where the arbitration had been actively pursued, the mandate of the arbitrator had expired, and the respondent did not oppose the request. The Court treated the time and labour already invested in the proceedings as a relevant consideration and granted extension under the arbitration statute, allowing the proceedings to continue up to 30.09.2020 reckoned from 18.08.2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:11:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1001 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393857</link>
      <description>Time for completion of arbitral proceedings and making the award was extended where the arbitration had been actively pursued, the mandate of the arbitrator had expired, and the respondent did not oppose the request. The Court treated the time and labour already invested in the proceedings as a relevant consideration and granted extension under the arbitration statute, allowing the proceedings to continue up to 30.09.2020 reckoned from 18.08.2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>