https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393856 Where the record showed that the adjudication order was duly served by registered post at the appellant's premises, and the appeal was filed about 15 months later without sufficient cause for condonation, the Tribunal was justified in treating the appeal as time-barred. The High Court found no substantial question of law arising from this factual determination and declined interference. The result confirms that established service of the order, combined with an unexplained delay in filing the appeal, permits dismissal on limitation without examination of the merits. en-us Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:11:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393856 Where the record showed that the adjudication order was duly served by registered post at the appellant's premises, and the appeal was filed about 15 months later without sufficient cause for condonation, the Tribunal was justified in treating the appeal as time-barred. The High Court found no substantial question of law arising from this factual determination and declined interference. The result confirms that established service of the order, combined with an unexplained delay in filing the appeal, permits dismissal on limitation without examination of the merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393856