<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 998 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393854</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was entitled to interest at a rate of 12% for delayed refund payment, based on statutory provisions and a Supreme Court ruling. The initial rejection of the abatement claim was overturned, and the appellant was granted a refund of duty with interest. The Tribunal emphasized that the interest rate should fall within the range specified by the Central Government and that notifications cannot override statutory provisions, as clarified by the Supreme Court in a similar case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:10:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 998 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393854</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was entitled to interest at a rate of 12% for delayed refund payment, based on statutory provisions and a Supreme Court ruling. The initial rejection of the abatement claim was overturned, and the appellant was granted a refund of duty with interest. The Tribunal emphasized that the interest rate should fall within the range specified by the Central Government and that notifications cannot override statutory provisions, as clarified by the Supreme Court in a similar case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>