<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 990 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393846</link>
    <description>Quashing of cheque dishonour proceedings under inherent criminal jurisdiction is confined to exceptional cases, such as absence of offence, legal bar, absurdity, or mala fide prosecution, and the court will not undertake a pre-trial appraisal of disputed facts or credibility. On the facts discussed, a prima facie case and sufficient ground for proceeding were found, so the complaint, summoning order and proceedings were not quashed. At the same time, the compensatory object of cheque dishonour law and the policy favouring early settlement justified granting time to pursue compounding through compromise, with the non-bailable warrant kept in abeyance for that limited period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 990 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393846</link>
      <description>Quashing of cheque dishonour proceedings under inherent criminal jurisdiction is confined to exceptional cases, such as absence of offence, legal bar, absurdity, or mala fide prosecution, and the court will not undertake a pre-trial appraisal of disputed facts or credibility. On the facts discussed, a prima facie case and sufficient ground for proceeding were found, so the complaint, summoning order and proceedings were not quashed. At the same time, the compensatory object of cheque dishonour law and the policy favouring early settlement justified granting time to pursue compounding through compromise, with the non-bailable warrant kept in abeyance for that limited period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>