https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393843 Revisional interference with concurrent findings in a cheque dishonour prosecution is not warranted absent jurisdictional error or perversity. The complainant's evidence on the loan, issuance and dishonour of the cheque, statutory notice, and non-payment was accepted, while the accused's claim that the cheque was torn, forged, or misused was disbelieved on the evidence. The trial court's signature comparison and assessment of surrounding circumstances disclosed no infirmity. The accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption on a preponderance of probability, so the conviction and sentence were upheld and the revision was dismissed. en-us Tue, 18 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393843 Revisional interference with concurrent findings in a cheque dishonour prosecution is not warranted absent jurisdictional error or perversity. The complainant's evidence on the loan, issuance and dishonour of the cheque, statutory notice, and non-payment was accepted, while the accused's claim that the cheque was torn, forged, or misused was disbelieved on the evidence. The trial court's signature comparison and assessment of surrounding circumstances disclosed no infirmity. The accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption on a preponderance of probability, so the conviction and sentence were upheld and the revision was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393843