https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286981 The court dismissed the suit, ruling that the plaintiff's claims were barred by the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988. The court found the suit not maintainable as it lacked valid documentation or fiduciary relationship supporting the claim of holding shares in trust. Additionally, the court imposed costs of Rs. 20,000 on the plaintiff for abusing the court process. en-us Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Aug 2023 13:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286981 The court dismissed the suit, ruling that the plaintiff's claims were barred by the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988. The court found the suit not maintainable as it lacked valid documentation or fiduciary relationship supporting the claim of holding shares in trust. Additionally, the court imposed costs of Rs. 20,000 on the plaintiff for abusing the court process. Case-Laws Benami Property Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286981