<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 978 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393834</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the challenge to communications advising deposit of interest amounts under Section 50 of the Central Goods and Sales Tax Act, 2017, without adjudication or compliance with principles of natural justice. The court found the communications to be informative and providing an opportunity for voluntary compliance, without coercive action. It granted liberty to issue a show cause notice for interest recovery, allowing the petitioners to present their case. The court emphasized that it did not make determinations on the arguments, leaving them open for consideration by the appropriate authority. The petition was disposed of without cost orders, permitting the respondent to proceed with issuing a show cause notice in compliance with legal procedures and principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 15:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 978 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393834</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the challenge to communications advising deposit of interest amounts under Section 50 of the Central Goods and Sales Tax Act, 2017, without adjudication or compliance with principles of natural justice. The court found the communications to be informative and providing an opportunity for voluntary compliance, without coercive action. It granted liberty to issue a show cause notice for interest recovery, allowing the petitioners to present their case. The court emphasized that it did not make determinations on the arguments, leaving them open for consideration by the appropriate authority. The petition was disposed of without cost orders, permitting the respondent to proceed with issuing a show cause notice in compliance with legal procedures and principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>