<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Orders Reconsideration of Denied ITC Due to Incomplete E-Way Bill u/s 129 Detention.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=52518</link>
    <description>Denial of Input Tax Credit (ITC) - Tax paid u/s 129 after detention of goods alongwith the vehicle - part B of the e-way bill was not filled up - the matter requires serious reconsideration at the hands of the 1st respondent as vital aspects enumerated in paras 15 and 16 of the Writ Petition (Civil) have not been duly considered and adverted to by the 1st respondent. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:44:27 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:44:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Orders Reconsideration of Denied ITC Due to Incomplete E-Way Bill u/s 129 Detention.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=52518</link>
      <description>Denial of Input Tax Credit (ITC) - Tax paid u/s 129 after detention of goods alongwith the vehicle - part B of the e-way bill was not filled up - the matter requires serious reconsideration at the hands of the 1st respondent as vital aspects enumerated in paras 15 and 16 of the Writ Petition (Civil) have not been duly considered and adverted to by the 1st respondent. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:44:27 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=52518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>