https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393827 The court upheld the impugned order dated 17.02.2011, confirming the taxability of consultancy services rendered by a non-resident firm under Indian law. The petitioner's arguments regarding the utilization of services outside India were rejected, and it was ruled that the services were indeed utilized in India, making them subject to tax deduction in India. Additionally, the court allowed the petitioner to pursue benefits under the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement by submitting a proper application within thirty days. en-us Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Oct 2020 17:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393827 The court upheld the impugned order dated 17.02.2011, confirming the taxability of consultancy services rendered by a non-resident firm under Indian law. The petitioner's arguments regarding the utilization of services outside India were rejected, and it was ruled that the services were indeed utilized in India, making them subject to tax deduction in India. Additionally, the court allowed the petitioner to pursue benefits under the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement by submitting a proper application within thirty days. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393827