<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 963 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393819</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax lacked jurisdiction to invoke revisional powers under section 263 for the second time as the Assessing Officer had complied with specific directions. Additionally, the reassessment order was deemed not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue, as the AO conducted a thorough investigation. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the Commissioner&#039;s order and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:18:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 963 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393819</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax lacked jurisdiction to invoke revisional powers under section 263 for the second time as the Assessing Officer had complied with specific directions. Additionally, the reassessment order was deemed not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue, as the AO conducted a thorough investigation. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the Commissioner&#039;s order and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>