<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 958 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393814</link>
    <description>The ITAT reversed the orders declaring the appellant as &quot;an assessee in default&quot; under section 201(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that payments made to staff were not of a contractual nature and should be subject to section 192, not section 194C. Consequently, penalties imposed were annulled, and all appeals were allowed, underscoring the necessity of accurate application of tax provisions based on the nature of payments and the legal relationship between parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 12:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 958 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393814</link>
      <description>The ITAT reversed the orders declaring the appellant as &quot;an assessee in default&quot; under section 201(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that payments made to staff were not of a contractual nature and should be subject to section 192, not section 194C. Consequently, penalties imposed were annulled, and all appeals were allowed, underscoring the necessity of accurate application of tax provisions based on the nature of payments and the legal relationship between parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>