<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 35AD Deductions Valid Regardless of Operational Date, Supported by &#039;Ceebros&#039; Case Precedent.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=52504</link>
    <description>Deduction u/s 35AD - Even if, arguendo, these facts were to be accepted, they do not detract from the settled position [as per &#039;Ceebros&#039; (supra)], that once the conditions of section 35AD are fulfilled, the section, per se, not requiring any specific date of operation, the deduction thereunder cannot be disallowed. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2020 11:23:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2020 11:23:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 35AD Deductions Valid Regardless of Operational Date, Supported by &#039;Ceebros&#039; Case Precedent.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=52504</link>
      <description>Deduction u/s 35AD - Even if, arguendo, these facts were to be accepted, they do not detract from the settled position [as per &#039;Ceebros&#039; (supra)], that once the conditions of section 35AD are fulfilled, the section, per se, not requiring any specific date of operation, the deduction thereunder cannot be disallowed. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2020 11:23:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=52504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>