https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393785 An order dismissing an appeal as premature was quashed because the Tribunal had not ly considered co-ordinate Bench decisions taking a different view in identical circumstances. The High Court held that maintainability required fresh examination after the cited authorities were addressed and an informed view was taken on whether the appeal was premature. The matter was remanded to the Tribunal for reconsideration of maintainability, and if the Tribunal finds the appeal maintainable, it must then decide the appeal on merits. en-us Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Nov 2020 17:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393785 An order dismissing an appeal as premature was quashed because the Tribunal had not ly considered co-ordinate Bench decisions taking a different view in identical circumstances. The High Court held that maintainability required fresh examination after the cited authorities were addressed and an informed view was taken on whether the appeal was premature. The matter was remanded to the Tribunal for reconsideration of maintainability, and if the Tribunal finds the appeal maintainable, it must then decide the appeal on merits. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393785