<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 923 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393779</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal due to reasons of late receipt of order, employee leaving the job, and family member&#039;s death. The tribunal found a lack of due diligence on the appellant&#039;s part and deemed the grounds for delay insufficient, as the family member&#039;s death occurred after the limitation period had expired. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2020 11:15:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 923 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393779</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal due to reasons of late receipt of order, employee leaving the job, and family member&#039;s death. The tribunal found a lack of due diligence on the appellant&#039;s part and deemed the grounds for delay insufficient, as the family member&#039;s death occurred after the limitation period had expired. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>