<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 1000 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286967</link>
    <description>Title to the flat stood in the plaintiff&#039;s name, so the defendants&#039; claimed contribution toward the purchase price did not create any ownership interest or a right to remain in possession. A plea of lack of clean hands could not defeat a claim for possession once entitlement was shown, because such relief is not discretionary in that situation. The withdrawn disinheritance notice also gave no present possessory right, since any inheritance could arise only on the plaintiff&#039;s death. An attempt to amend the written statement after hearing was refused as immaterial. The suit was decreed for possession, with mesne profits following and liberty to seek inquiry if execution was resisted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2020 10:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 1000 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286967</link>
      <description>Title to the flat stood in the plaintiff&#039;s name, so the defendants&#039; claimed contribution toward the purchase price did not create any ownership interest or a right to remain in possession. A plea of lack of clean hands could not defeat a claim for possession once entitlement was shown, because such relief is not discretionary in that situation. The withdrawn disinheritance notice also gave no present possessory right, since any inheritance could arise only on the plaintiff&#039;s death. An attempt to amend the written statement after hearing was refused as immaterial. The suit was decreed for possession, with mesne profits following and liberty to seek inquiry if execution was resisted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>