https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393767 The Court allowed the condonation of a 412-day delay in filing a Letters Patent Appeal. The Tax Appeal, initially dismissed for non-prosecution, was restored after the Court accepted the explanation provided by the department regarding the delay. The Court found the delay unintentional due to miscommunication and the resignation of the original advocate. Consequently, the Tax Appeal was restored for further proceedings before the appropriate Court, granting the relief sought by the applicant. en-us Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Mar 2020 09:47:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393767 The Court allowed the condonation of a 412-day delay in filing a Letters Patent Appeal. The Tax Appeal, initially dismissed for non-prosecution, was restored after the Court accepted the explanation provided by the department regarding the delay. The Court found the delay unintentional due to miscommunication and the resignation of the original advocate. Consequently, the Tax Appeal was restored for further proceedings before the appropriate Court, granting the relief sought by the applicant. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393767