https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286961 Section 14(3)(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 is explained as a purposive exception to the general bar on specific performance of contracts for construction or other work on land. A developer is not excluded merely because the owner did not obtain possession under the contract, but the statutory conditions must still be met. The agreement must define the work with sufficient precision and create enforceable development rights; where terms are vague or the alleged loss can be adequately compensated in money, specific performance will not lie. The commentary also notes that relief depends on strict satisfaction of these requirements. en-us Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 22 Mar 2020 16:40:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286961 Section 14(3)(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 is explained as a purposive exception to the general bar on specific performance of contracts for construction or other work on land. A developer is not excluded merely because the owner did not obtain possession under the contract, but the statutory conditions must still be met. The agreement must define the work with sufficient precision and create enforceable development rights; where terms are vague or the alleged loss can be adequately compensated in money, specific performance will not lie. The commentary also notes that relief depends on strict satisfaction of these requirements. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286961