<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (5) TMI 26 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21772</link>
    <description>The court held that the assessee was entitled to investment allowance on the additional liability due to exchange rate fluctuation, provided the liability was capitalized on the date of actual payment. The Income-tax Officer was directed to allow the assessee an opportunity to create the necessary reserve for such additional sums eligible for investment allowance. The court referenced relevant case law and statutory provisions to support its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:04:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (5) TMI 26 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21772</link>
      <description>The court held that the assessee was entitled to investment allowance on the additional liability due to exchange rate fluctuation, provided the liability was capitalized on the date of actual payment. The Income-tax Officer was directed to allow the assessee an opportunity to create the necessary reserve for such additional sums eligible for investment allowance. The court referenced relevant case law and statutory provisions to support its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>