<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (7) TMI 48 - ANDHRA PARDESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286953</link>
    <description>A prior compromise fixing maintenance, even with a waiver against future enhancement, does not prevent alteration where there is a material change in circumstances under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956. Section 25 was read to permit adjustment of maintenance fixed by decree or agreement in its ordinary sense, including agreements containing waiver clauses, so the widow could seek enhancement. The Act was also treated as a codifying and amending statute that applies to widows of persons who died before commencement, since Section 22 imposes liability in general terms and the statute itself contains express temporal limits where intended. The widow&#039;s claim to enhanced maintenance was therefore maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2020 17:13:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (7) TMI 48 - ANDHRA PARDESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286953</link>
      <description>A prior compromise fixing maintenance, even with a waiver against future enhancement, does not prevent alteration where there is a material change in circumstances under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956. Section 25 was read to permit adjustment of maintenance fixed by decree or agreement in its ordinary sense, including agreements containing waiver clauses, so the widow could seek enhancement. The Act was also treated as a codifying and amending statute that applies to widows of persons who died before commencement, since Section 22 imposes liability in general terms and the statute itself contains express temporal limits where intended. The widow&#039;s claim to enhanced maintenance was therefore maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>