<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (11) TMI 38 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21769</link>
    <description>Rent paid for premises used to run a business of providing lodging and boarding facilities to staff members of sister concerns was treated as trading expenditure incurred wholly for the assessee&#039;s business. On the concurrent findings of the appellate authorities, the expense was allowable under section 28 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. As a result, the disallowance provision in section 37(4) did not apply, because the payment was not a non-business or inadmissible expenditure but part of the business trading outlay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:52:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (11) TMI 38 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21769</link>
      <description>Rent paid for premises used to run a business of providing lodging and boarding facilities to staff members of sister concerns was treated as trading expenditure incurred wholly for the assessee&#039;s business. On the concurrent findings of the appellate authorities, the expense was allowable under section 28 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. As a result, the disallowance provision in section 37(4) did not apply, because the payment was not a non-business or inadmissible expenditure but part of the business trading outlay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>