https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393746 The court quashed the order for the release of goods detained during transportation due to discrepancies in valuation, emphasizing that detention without legal authority was unjustified. The court held that the driver had all necessary documents, and discrepancies in valuation should not warrant seizure unless supported by law. The court referenced a similar case to support releasing the goods, stating that under-valuation in an invoice should not lead to detention under Section 129, directing immediate release of the goods and allowing the State to pursue legal action for undervaluation separately. en-us Mon, 16 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Mar 2025 14:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393746 The court quashed the order for the release of goods detained during transportation due to discrepancies in valuation, emphasizing that detention without legal authority was unjustified. The court held that the driver had all necessary documents, and discrepancies in valuation should not warrant seizure unless supported by law. The court referenced a similar case to support releasing the goods, stating that under-valuation in an invoice should not lead to detention under Section 129, directing immediate release of the goods and allowing the State to pursue legal action for undervaluation separately. Case-Laws GST Mon, 16 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393746