<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 887 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393743</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta dismissed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning payments to distributors in prepaid SIM cards totaling over Rs. 3 crores. The court addressed whether these payments should be categorized as a discount or commission under Section 194H. Despite a significant delay of 586 days in filing the appeal, the court refused to condone the delay, emphasizing the need for prompt and efficient appeal processes. The court&#039;s decision highlighted the importance of timely procedural compliance and rejected leniency for unjustifiable delays, ultimately dismissing the appeal and related applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2020 13:31:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 887 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393743</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta dismissed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning payments to distributors in prepaid SIM cards totaling over Rs. 3 crores. The court addressed whether these payments should be categorized as a discount or commission under Section 194H. Despite a significant delay of 586 days in filing the appeal, the court refused to condone the delay, emphasizing the need for prompt and efficient appeal processes. The court&#039;s decision highlighted the importance of timely procedural compliance and rejected leniency for unjustifiable delays, ultimately dismissing the appeal and related applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>