<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 886 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393742</link>
    <description>The Court concluded that the Settlement Commission&#039;s order, challenged by the Assessee, did not require interference. The Assessee was granted liberty to present subsequent Supreme Court decisions to the Settlement Commission for consideration. As the impugned order complied with a remand order, any changes in the legal landscape could be addressed through the Settlement Commission. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, allowing the Assessee the opportunity to seek redressal based on updated legal positions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 13:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 886 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393742</link>
      <description>The Court concluded that the Settlement Commission&#039;s order, challenged by the Assessee, did not require interference. The Assessee was granted liberty to present subsequent Supreme Court decisions to the Settlement Commission for consideration. As the impugned order complied with a remand order, any changes in the legal landscape could be addressed through the Settlement Commission. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, allowing the Assessee the opportunity to seek redressal based on updated legal positions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>