<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 883 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393739</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the appellant regarding income from leasing and renting of properties, considering it as business income. However, the Court sided with the Revenue in treating income from maintenance charges and air conditioning hire charges as income from other sources, not business income. The appeal was disposed of with no costs, resulting in a split decision on the two issues raised in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2020 13:30:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 883 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393739</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the appellant regarding income from leasing and renting of properties, considering it as business income. However, the Court sided with the Revenue in treating income from maintenance charges and air conditioning hire charges as income from other sources, not business income. The appeal was disposed of with no costs, resulting in a split decision on the two issues raised in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>