<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 874 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393730</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order of the ld. CIT(A) and deleted the addition of Rs. 20,00,000/- made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. It was concluded that once the income had already been taxed in the hands of the share applicant companies, no further disallowance was warranted in the hands of the assessee company. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, emphasizing that the same amount cannot be taxed twice, in line with previous judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 16:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 874 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393730</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order of the ld. CIT(A) and deleted the addition of Rs. 20,00,000/- made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. It was concluded that once the income had already been taxed in the hands of the share applicant companies, no further disallowance was warranted in the hands of the assessee company. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, emphasizing that the same amount cannot be taxed twice, in line with previous judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>