<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 861 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393717</link>
    <description>The court set aside the order listing the petitioner company on the Denied Entity List and the vague Show Cause Notice, emphasizing violations of natural justice principles and procedural rules. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, highlighting breaches of the law, rules, and guidelines in the respondent&#039;s actions. The judgment did not prevent future lawful actions by the respondent but allowed the petitioner&#039;s petition without costs imposed on either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 861 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393717</link>
      <description>The court set aside the order listing the petitioner company on the Denied Entity List and the vague Show Cause Notice, emphasizing violations of natural justice principles and procedural rules. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, highlighting breaches of the law, rules, and guidelines in the respondent&#039;s actions. The judgment did not prevent future lawful actions by the respondent but allowed the petitioner&#039;s petition without costs imposed on either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>