<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 859 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393715</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition seeking provisional release of seized gold under Section 110 (A) of the Customs Act, 1962. It emphasized the need for completion of the adjudication process before releasing the goods, in line with legal provisions and court precedents. The court instructed the Adjudicating Authority to decide on the release by a specified date, granting a hearing opportunity to the petitioner if requested, without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=607627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 859 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393715</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition seeking provisional release of seized gold under Section 110 (A) of the Customs Act, 1962. It emphasized the need for completion of the adjudication process before releasing the goods, in line with legal provisions and court precedents. The court instructed the Adjudicating Authority to decide on the release by a specified date, granting a hearing opportunity to the petitioner if requested, without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>